HabitatSelection 0.2
    • Explanation of the methods
    • Appendix 1 (plain language)
    • Central place foragers (CPF)
    • Appendix 2 (simulation)
    • Appendix 3 (model fitting)
    • Non central place foragers (NCPF)
    • Appendix 4 (simulation)
    • Appendix 5 (model fitting)
    • Supplementary Results
    • Appendix 6

Appendix 6. Supplementary Figures

Modelling wildlife habitat selection from tracking data: A practical guide for ecologists

Figure S1. Comparison of habitat selection estimates obtained for each model in both central place foraging (CPF) and non-central place foraging (NCPF) scenarios, with associated 95% confidence intervals. The dashed line marks the observed relative selection for each foraging strategy. The solid horizontal line corresponds to the chosen habitat selection parameter (beta) used in the step selection component of the simulations (from 0 to 1.5 in 0.5 increments). Models fitted to thinned datasets are indicated with an asterisk (*). Each model was fitted to a distinct sample of 50 individuals drawn from the full population of 1,000 simulated tracks. Acronyms are defined in Table 1 (see main text for details).